Unique take on the greatest masterpiece in all music
Allan Brain | Houston, TX USA | 04/25/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Of the so-called "historically informed performance"
HIP) versions of this incredible work,
this one stands out for a number of reasons.
Most importantly, it is a performance full of vigor and enthusiasm.
That is how Bach was meant to be performed.
Robert King is an HIP specialist, whose many
recordings of Purcell are among the best,
so not surprisingly,this is not by any
means "academic" or "dry" as some HIP
versions are, or are alleged to be.
Like most other HIP performances,
this one employs original instruments
and slightly different pitch. Unlike most others,
it also uses strictly "original forces".
Not only a boys choir,but even boys as soloists,
as Bach used in his time. And they are pretty
good too. Are they as good as the competition?
Of course not. You won't hear the beauty of the
soprano or alto parts that you hear from
recordings using top-flight female stars.
But you will hear a kind of sincerity and
reverential attitude that is exactly
"in tune" with Bach's music (much like
what you hear in the few Bach cantata
recordings that use boy soloists).
This is the greatest masterpiece in all
music, so you would do well to have a few
recordings to sample different ways of
performing it. If you like HIP and can
only afford one recording, I would
recommend the Gardiner on DGG, but this is
a close runner-up to that one in
several respects. If you can't stand
boys choirs or boys as alto and soprano
soloists, stay away.
Several other conductors have used
"original forces", but not in this
work. And even most of them did
not use boy altos, but countertenors.
One could argue the merits of King's
explanation of this performance and
recording that appears in the liner notes.
As in, are these boys really representative
of how Bach's boys sounded?
(Boys' voices changed later back then.)
But I don't think that really matters.
The real point is that this is a fine and
moving performance with the brisk tempos,
small scale orchestra, light string playing, etc. characteristic of the HIP movement that
also adds a kind of spirituality and excitement
that is missed in others.
"
More human than some humans
kelsie | Plainview, Texas United States | 05/21/2008
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Robert King's HIP recording is worlds away from anything you've ever heard, Bach or otherwise. His landmark decision to not only replace the soprano and alto women's voices in the choir with a boys' choir, but to also put in a treble (high boy soprano) and boy alto in place of the women soloists, makes for one of the most unique Mass readings in the catalog.
First, some issues that may bother some listeners:
* Folks approaching the work for the first time would be better starting with Karl-Frederich Beringer's reading (Bach: Mass in B Minor/Beringer/Windsbach Boy's Choir); it also uses a boys' choir and Baroque instruments (along with an extra ensemble of trumpets to boot), but it doesn't have some of the issues (or features) of King's recording.
* For fans of treble choirs in general, the Tölzenknabenchor is not the same thing as Libera (Robert King, not Robert Prizeman)! Nothing wrong with that (Libera is wonderful), but the sound is totally different.
* Perfectionists or ultrapurists will be put off by the treble soloist's breathless reading of the "Laudamus Te," and the boys' choir in general has lots of trouble in places: the complicated melismas of the "Cum sancto Spiritu" or the all-but-impossible melismas in the "Osanna," for example. So if your standard is something like Pearlman or Gardiner, this might not be for you.
After all that:
I love, love, LOVE this set! Out of the twenty-three recordings of this piece I own, this one is outstanding for so many reasons--some of which are the "wrong" reasons for a few.
The highlight of the recording is the boys' choir itself. They literally sing their hearts out. They aren't perfect, and that's okay, because the humanity, the depth of feeling and commitment, is palpable and undeniable, from the first cry of "Kyrie!" to the conclusion's fervent plea for peace--and THAT, more than technical perfection or clever sound engineering, is what's most important in this Bach's final and greatest vocal masterpiece.
The treble and boy alto soloists grapple with this music in what seems like a titanic struggle sometimes (the "Laudamus" and "Qui sedes" in particular), and they come out no worse for the wear. Again, the performance isn't perfect, but anyone even remotely familiar with the music can't help but smile at the huge, commendable effort put out here by the two soloists (the treble sounds no older than 13 or 14), tackling one of the greatest works of Western art so early in life.
There are also some wonderful moments when the whole thing--tuning, tempo, technique, dynamics--comes together like clockwork: the imperial, uncompromising "Confiteor," the rush into paradise that is the "Et expecto," the declamation of God's majesty in the "Sanctus." The horn player opening the "Quoniam" plays with red-blooded, full force. But on the whole, what makes this recording so unique and wonderful is what makes each diamond unique from one another: those occasionally small, occasionally not-so-small flaws.
When people uplift John Eliot Gardiner's "Mass in B minor for Chorus, Orchestra, and Recording Engineers" to the high (and unfounded) honor of "the most authentic" or whatnot, they're forgetting one tiny bit of trivia: there was a distinct lack of sophisticated recording technology in eighteenth-century Leipzig. What the audience (or congregation) heard was the "warts and all," the mistakes, the flubs, the clams, and yes, the slurred mess of melismas.
That's "authentic," and while "pristine" or "perfect" might not be the most appropriate words here, "human," "spontaneous," and "supremely moving" surely are. One of my very favorite performances of anything by anyone."