Piano Sonata No. 8 in C minor ('Pathétique'), Op. 13: Grave - Allegro di molto e con brio
Piano Sonata No. 8 in C minor ('Pathétique'), Op. 13: Andante cantabile
Piano Sonata No. 8 in C minor ('Pathétique'), Op. 13: Rondo, Allegro
Piano Sonata No. 29 in B flat major ('Hammerklavier'), Op. 106: Allegro
Piano Sonata No. 29 in B flat major ('Hammerklavier'), Op. 106: Scherzo, Assai vivace
Piano Sonata No. 29 in B flat major ('Hammerklavier'), Op. 106: Adagio sostenuto, Appassionato e on molto sentimento
Piano Sonata No. 29 in B flat major ('Hammerklavier'), Op. 106: Largo, Allegro risoluto / Fuga
Fantasia for piano in G minor, Op. 77
This extraordinary disc couples two of Beethoven's greatest sonatas in performances that are second to none. Rudolf Serkin's Beethoven credentials were legendary, offering an ideal combination of musical integrity and inte... more »llectual strength. His approach pays particular dividends in the Hammerklavier Sonata, where his liveliness and lack of pretension makes the work far less forbidding than it can sound in other hands. Both the Pathétique and Hammerklavier Sonatas are essential listening for anyone interested in Beethoven's piano music; and at budget price, with the rarely heard Fantasia, Op. 77, tossed in for good measure, it doesn't get better than this. --David Hurwitz« less
This extraordinary disc couples two of Beethoven's greatest sonatas in performances that are second to none. Rudolf Serkin's Beethoven credentials were legendary, offering an ideal combination of musical integrity and intellectual strength. His approach pays particular dividends in the Hammerklavier Sonata, where his liveliness and lack of pretension makes the work far less forbidding than it can sound in other hands. Both the Pathétique and Hammerklavier Sonatas are essential listening for anyone interested in Beethoven's piano music; and at budget price, with the rarely heard Fantasia, Op. 77, tossed in for good measure, it doesn't get better than this. --David Hurwitz
DAVID BRYSON | Glossop Derbyshire England | 07/12/2003
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Is Serkin to your taste? Aficionados of pianos without hammers will not find much of what they are looking for here!. However if your impression of him is mainly raw power and tension, I believe you stand to discover one of the deepest and most complex and thoughtful interpretative worlds in the entire 20th century. The Pathetique gets an athletic reading in the outer movements, slightly solemn in the slow movement. One unusual feature is that the Grave introduction is included in the repeat - Beethoven does not actually say where to start the repeat. The rarely heard G minor fantasia is my idea of Beethoven playing at its greatest. The piece is top-rate Beethoven with abrupt changes of mood that Serkin can articulate like nobody else. And for outstanding beauty and delicacy try the variation-theme and the first variation. In op 106 Serkin does not rush the outer movements. The familiar strength of line is there of course, but there is infinite attention to detail. In the scherzo he does not attempt the 'snap' that some younger players put into the rhythmic figure, and I found myself wondering how Serkin himself played it when younger. But it may have nothing to do with age. He does not always do what you expect, to say the least, and Richter for one, in his very attractive live performance from Blythburgh church, is even less inclined to go with the young lions here. The slow movement is famously Beethoven at his deepest, and to say this is not your average interpretation would be an understatement. The opening is not pianissimo, and I was surprised to find that there is no dynamic marking at all, which in Beethoven usually means something like mezzopiano. The speed seems faster then usual, but I timed Serkin at 16 minutes to Richter's 17, so overall there is little difference. The left-hand chords in the transition-theme are unpedalled for once -- why on earth did Beethoven labour with his quill pen to write chords short and followed by rests if, like everyone else I can recall, the player undoes the effect with pedal? The reprise of the main theme is, for me, the greatest sequence in all Beethoven, and here you get the full sense of Serkin's flowing tempo -- the phrasing, the continuity, the rhythmic subtlety are sublime. In the course of this stupendous passage Beethoven writes 'molto espressivo' -- what was the rest of it, for heavens sake? What more can the interpreter do? Just listen to that mighty left hand shouldering its way (to mix my anatomical metaphors) through the flickering figuration in the right and you will find out. The last movement is utterly uncompromising, (and I should think so too), culminating in some really prodigious fortissimo trills. It's an experience not to be missed. Be prepared for the start -- I know from hearing him play the piece live just what a gigantic sound Serkin produced in those opening chords. By comparison Richter hardly seems to be trying. What makes them extraordinary is the wonderful rich tone, quite unlike the familiar Serkin crash on fortissimo chords (you can hear that in the finale). It obviously gave the recording engineers a problem, because in the following phrase the piano momentarily seems a bit distant. I may mention here that although Serkin's pedalling is rather audible, we are mercifully spared his vocalising. I could go on for long enough pulling out plums, but I will settle for just two more details. The lovely running duet between the hands in the first movement is as from nobody else. Serkin simply follows Tovey's instruction 'left hand leads'. At the reprise of the main theme in the same movement Serkin is too loyal to Beethoven to play the sublime but unauthentic reading of A sharp in the lead-in bar, which Pollini, Richter and Solomon among others play. Can there possibly be such a thing as Beethoven Improved? Well, the exception proves the rule. Even that high priest of Beethoven Professor Tovey sighs for A sharp not A natural here, but has to admit that it's not what B wrote. However if the whole idea seems blasphemy to anyone, rest assured that you will not get Serkin altering Beethoven, even for the better."
WHAT IF YOU COULD SEE BEETHOVEN'S SOUL..WOULD YOU DARE LOOK?
demien | U.S.A. | 09/08/2001
(5 out of 5 stars)
"RUDOLF SERKIN WAS A MASTER PIANIST WHO SPECIALIZED IN THE GERMAN ROMANTICS SUCH AS BEETHOVEN AND BRAHMS.
SERKIN WAS A COMBINATION OF THE HEART AND THE INTELLECT AND WHEN BOTH OF THOSE INGREDIENTS CLICKED AS THEY DO HERE... YOU HAD A UNBEATABLE COMBINATION.
SERKIN'S HAMMERKLAVIER IS A MARVEL OF STRENGTH,CONCENTRATION,AND SPIRITUALITY.
ATTENTION AND CLARITY OF DETAIL COMBINED WITH PRECISION AND INSPIRATION MAKE FOR THE MOST COMPELLING RESULTS IN WHAT IS CONSIDERED BY MANY TO BE THE GREATEST PIECE OF CLASSICAL KEYBOARD MUSIC.
SERKIN TAKES A MORE EXPANSIVE VIEW OF THE FIRST MOVEMENT (CLOCKING IN ABOUT 12 MINUTES)YET THE POWER AND MAJESTY ARE NOT LOST AS HE STRIKES EVERY NOTE WITH CONVICTION AND A MIGHTY AUTHORITY. THE SCHERZO IS PLAYFULL AND PRANCES WITH DELIGHT AS IT SHOULD MEANWHILE THE IMMORTAL ADAGIO IS TAKEN AT A FASTER TEMPO(ABOUT 16 MINUTES)WHICH DOES NOT AFFECT THE IMPACT DUE TO SERKIN'S ROCK SOLID CONCENTRATION AND MASTERFUL WAY OF PACING AND PHRASING.
SERKIN TAKES THE ADAGIO AND DIGS DEEP INTO THE CORE OF ITS SOUL AS HE KEENLY UNVEILS THE EMPTINESS AND SORROW THAT LIE WITHIN EVERY NOTE.
THE FINAL MOVEMENT IS TECHNICALLY IMMACULATE AS SERKIN HANDLES THE COMPLEX MELODIC STRUCTURE AND RHYTHMIC COMPLEXITY MEANWHILE RETAINING THE GHOULISH DANCING MOMENTUM THAT THIS MOVEMENT ENTAILS.
MARVELOUS!
O.F."
The greatest Pathetique; A topflight Hammerklavier. And the
John Parker Marmaro | Spring Hill, Florida | 10/21/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
"This disc is a MUST-HAVE. Even if you already have other recordings of the Pathetique and Hammerklavier. Why? the most obvious reason is the inclusion of Serkin's splendid performance of the almost impossible to find Fantasy in G Minor, Op.77 -- in fact, I don't think I have ever heard tell of another available recording. (Though Sony/Columbia have issued this recording with other couplings, such as the Diabelli Variations.) So how lucky we are that the one we DO have is by Rudolf Serkin, unquestionably one of the great pianists of the 20th Century.
A few words about op. 77 are in order here. The piece itself is fascinating, because it gives us, as it were, a glimpse of Beethoven's improvisatory technique-- it is (and the sketchbooks seem to support the notion) a case where the master appears to have pretty much merely written down an improvisation. And it is beautiful as well. It is also very interesting as per form. It begins with two somewhat dissonant downward glissandi, followed by an almost verbatim statement of the beautiful E minor piano theme from the slow movement of the G Major Piano Concerto (here given in G Minor). After repeating these transposed lower, there follows a series of very free variations on this theme. It is whittled down to its harmonic skeleton and then this is refashioned finally into a new (but clearly derived) theme in the major. At this point the downward glissandi recur, as if to point up or articulate this moment. The new, no-longer-melancholy transformation theme is now examined in a further series of variations -- and still the harmonic structure of the original sad G-Minor theme is audible throughout. After a penultimate triumphant variation, there is finally a quieter dissolution one, and then a coda-- at the end of which the original glissandi, no longer dissonant, round off the piece. A delightful piece, showing a genius at play!
Serkin's Hammerklavier is among the very best available. And if I myself would still award the laurel for BEST to another performance (Charles Rosen's flawless rendition, available on Sony/Columbia in a 2-disc set of the late Beethoven sonatas), Serkin's is almost as good: and if Rosen's particularly shines in the first and second movements, Serkin's playing in the third and fourth, especially, is utterly felicitous and humane. Certainly the peer of Brendel's famous version.
And the Pathetique! This is, in my considered opinion, the VERY BEST version of this magnificent early masterwork on record. And I have heard very many other recordings, as well as numerous live performances. None have equalled, and few have approached, Serkin's magisterial performance. Especially of the first movement: exquistively gauged in every respect. His tempi are authentically very fast, yet he makes it sound effortless: never has the allegro been more thrilling in its athleticism, and his bringing out of the themes, yet never at the sacrifice of the whirling accompaniments, is -- perfect. So many performers play this movement with a heavy hand and a great deal of (albeit subtle) rubato. The very lightness of Serkin's touch adds to the almost physical thrill of the movement, which can fairly send chills up one's spine. Hearing his version, one can almost see why some demagogues of the time thought the music subversive! (Mozart, though, I think, would have been delighted.) Serkin's rendering of the famous, luscious slow movement, and the agitated final rondo, are also magnificent.
In short, this disc is a MUST HAVE-- especially at its remarkably low price! Not only for the inclusion of the rare Fantasy in G, but also, for what is emphatically the benchmark version of the Pathetique, and one of the 3 or 4 best versions of the Hammerklavier. Don't hesitate! Snap it up before it goes out of print! Let us hope Sony will also release the Serkin performances of the wonderful Sonata no. 11 in B-Flat, Op. 22, and the op. 78 Sonata, which at one time were coupled with the Fantasy on vinyl."
Important works by Beethoven by an important pianist of the
Craig Matteson | Ann Arbor, MI | 10/23/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"It is more than a shame that this disk is out of print. I urge you to grab up a used copy while they can be found because Rudolph Serkin was a very important pianist of the twentieth century and deserves to be remembered. This recording of the Opus 13 sonata, the "Pathetique" is one we all studied as we learned the piece. It is rather unique because during the repeat after the first ending of the exposition Serkin includes the opening Grave as well. Most of our editions have the repeat double bar AFTER the Grave and that is the way it is most often played. I do not know what the manuscripts say, but Serkin's approach makes sense. Why? Because after the second ending, when the sonata continues, there is an abbreviated version of the opening Grave. If you don't repeat the opening Grave, there is little dramatic reason to bring it back after the second ending.
Serkin's playing is always strong and very intelligent. He was born in Austria and was a prodigy, received a sound music education, and made his first public performance at age 12. He became a touring professional at 17. He met and studied with the luminaries of his day and played with greats such as Adolph Busch (violinist and founder of the acclaimed Busch quartet). He eventually married Busch's daughter. When Germany annexed Austria, he left Europe to live in America. He was a professor and later director of the important Curtis Institute of Music in Philadelphia through 1976. Serkin and Busch, his father-in-law, founded the Marlboro Music Festival in 1951 and it continues to this day.
The version of the "Hammerklavier" recorded here is strong, witty and the amazing Adagio is so full of passion and intelligence that you are glad that Beethoven gave us so much music for such a pianist to play. The first movement is not taken at a breakneck tempo, but still keeps us moving along, but always in the service of a strong musical point of view. I am glad that he ignored the ridiculous and unplayable metronome marking of the first movement that some nowadays are still trying to claim as serious. The short scherzo is witty if not crisp and we understand the fun of it all.
Another reason to get this disk is to have a recording of the rarely recorded Fantasia, opus 77. A fantasia in the classic period is not unlike a toccata in the baroque. It is supposed to have an improvisational feel and a premium is placed on that feeling of contrast and unpredictability. Beethoven wrote a great fantasy and Serkin provides us with a masterful "improvisation".
So, snap up these disks while you can and I hope it gets back in print soon because this is too important a disk to have unavailable."
"Beethoven composed one of his most titanic and expansive Sonatas ever made and even the thematic material is deeply dense in amplitude and proposal, these are not defaults but just a part of the complex emotional sphere in which Ludwig was immersed.
The extensiveness of the work reveals a new attitude of Beethoven before the life. This Sonata is a real breakthrough with all the previous works in its genre. You could refuse the argument arguing to previous issues as Waldstein, Appassionata or Patetique, for instance are shorter and extremely precise and concise. That's correct but maybe you forget something and, in this sense the analysis may be extended to his Symphonies. Why is Beethoven so decided to write a work of colossal proportions in time extension and astonishing difficulties and great variety of emotive frequencies? The same reasoning remains valid for the Seventh Symphony respect to Ninth. Why sol long? And what's the purpose of human voices?
Personally I suspect the hidden reasons could be explained by three different arguments: the first of them and the most decisive is very simple: Beethoven's audience has vanished. The triviality has taken place in Vienna: the disturbing consequences of the French Revolution have elevated the rank of the mass media of those ages and many composers have found a chance to exhibit his abilities: I am talking about of Carl Maria von Weber and Rossini : two remarkable exponents of the academicism may height to the status of the people. So let's give to the audience what they want: evasion and entertainment. This idea must have permeated the mind and inspiration of the new composers who consider Beethoven the most fervent and passionate live musician in the world but a little bit old fashioned due he is not in a real state of mind with the audience. To say in management expressions: He has lost his share and so his specific weight in the market has reduced to minuscule proportions: Liberty, fraternity and equality in the music have imposed their codes.
In the other hand the growing concerns about his private life have not diminished; his deafness is absolute and he finds himself in a real dilemma: must I keep living in Vienna or thinking about another city?
Finally I guess the last step given by this genius was to get back to the essential roots and try to get in the enormous trace left by Bach a new way of musical expression: that would explain by itself the use of the Fugue form in his last three Sonatas and the absence of assertiveness in the final of every one of them . That's why their conclusions result vanishing and incorporeal suggesting perhaps a renounce due the lack of force.
In any case the reading of this Sonata will lead you to a real cathartic experience , the heart rending existential schism must have been a Dantesque laceration in the soul and spirit of that genius living in a city who applaud and raves by Rossini.
The interpretation of this work should be made to my mind taking in count all these premises, because if don't, the result would be a cold analytical performance , tour de force exhibition exercise to prove the technique and skillfulness of the pianist and nothing else: the audience can be satisfied, the artist may be proud of himself but the work's spirit is absent.
Rudolf Serkin makes a honest, convincing and extraordinary musical achievement with this performance. And -with the potent version of Wilhelm Kempff in the early fifties- I don't know of any other performance until now played with such score's understanding.