Search - Frederic Chopin, Eugene Ormandy, Philadelphia Orchestra :: Chopin: Piano Concertos Nos. 1 & 2

A bargain worth owning

Robert L. Berkowitz | Natick, MA United States | 09/18/2001

(5 out of 5 stars)

"I am an unabashed fan of Chopin's E minor concerto. I grew up with the recording by Czerny-Stefanska, incorrectly attributed to Dinu Lipatti. Her style and temperament sets the tone for my preferences. Emanuel Ax's recording has remained one of my favorites despite collecting many others. He communicates beautifully in this recording. There is a section toward the end of the first movement of the E minor that sounds to me as if the piano is pleading, or searching for sympathy and understanding. I often listen to that section to hear if the pianist can communicate that section well. Emanuel Ax touches me when he plays that section. He understands and conveys that message well. His second movement is lyrical and poignant and the last movement is played with seeming effortlessness, joy, playfulness and always with full attention to the singing quality of Chopin's writing. The F minor concerto is also very well performed. My only reservation about this disc, and the one reason that I continued to search for other recordings after owning this one, is that at times the woodwinds sound out of tune when playing along with the piano. This is especially noticeable in the last movement of the E minor.I found the recording by Garrick Ohlsson on Arabesque label to be equally satisfying, but that recording is full-price. I prefer Ax's recording to Zimerman's most recent recording (also full-price). I also prefer Ax's performance to Rubinstein's recording with Skrowaczewski (E minor), Perahia/ Mehta (though I prefer Perahia/ Mehta for the F minor concerto), Kissin's recording (although it is truly amazing given his tender age), Tirimo/ Glushcheko, Argerich/ Abbado, Argerich/ Dutoit, Simon/ Beissel (and I am a serious admirer of Abbey Simon's playing) and Pires/ Krivine (though this also has some beautiful playing, marred only by the lack of momentum at times). I even prefer it to my old Czerny-Stefanska recording. Ax's new recording with Mackerras cannot sustain my interest because I am disappointed by the sound of the period instrument. Otherwise his playing remains fine. There are other well-known recordings that I do not own that deserve to be compared to Ax's recording (Zimerman/ Guilini and the early Pollini recording come to mind). I have heard both of these and I believe they do not displace Ax in my list of recommendations. I also own a true recording of Lipatti, a highly individual recording by Samson Francois on EMI, and a recording by Rosina Lhevinne. These are each fine accounts that spark interest in part because of their historical value, but do not displace Ax's performance.Many of the recordings in my collection are full-priced. This bargain disc is a bargain in the best sense of the word -- delivering a performance worth having, apart from its price, at a price that cannot be ignored."

A wise choice!

Hiram Gomez Pardo | Valencia, Venezuela | 08/15/2006

(5 out of 5 stars)

"Emanuel Ax is actually one of the last champions pianists around Chopin `s work. His Chopin is far to be the traditional approach of languidness, soulful lyricism and tearful nostalgia. He adds heroic scope, bright glitter and that so missed sense of the span that seems an inexistent word in the lexicon of the great majority of the actual players.



His majestic playing is not only captivating but engaging. In past reviews I have told about my desert island choice: Samson Francois and Louis de Froment with the Luxembourg Orchestra. Nevertheless, this is a very attractive choice among the most distinguished, refined and filled of personality performances in the last years.



Go for this.



"

For the first, in E minor

Musicus | Oslo, Norway | 10/19/2006

(4 out of 5 stars)

"The E minor concerto is the reason to buy this CD, not the 2nd concerto in F minor.

My former favourite of the 1st concerto in E minor is Emil Gilels under the same conductor and orchestra, an earlier and more intense performance, but not as cozy and refined as the present one with Ax. Now I like both, the Ax/Ormandy and the Gilels/Ormandy. It is the first movement that gives such a kick by Gilels/Ormandy, whereas the Ax/Ormandy is better, warmer and - in one sense - more meaningful as a whole.



The 2nd in F minor however is not performed good enough. The reason for this opinion of mine is that I know it performed by Lamoureux Concert Association Orchestra with Clara Haskil at the piano, conducted by Igor Markevitch - a magic performance, both warm and yet with much more energy and joy! I have never come across anything that compares to it.

When it comes to the Perahia/Mehta-recording of both concertos, some reviewers claim that Mehta's conducting is a little lacklustre, so I don't take the risk of buying it. By the way, Clara Haskil and Markevitch don't leave anything to be desired as far as I am concerned. You shouldn't be without that one, although you get a lot "bonus-performences" with the buy, as it is one of many performances collected on two CDs for the price of one. Amazon-search: Favourite Piano Concertos, Vol.1."