A German Requiem, Op.45: Selig sind, die da Leid tragen
A German Requiem, Op.45: Denn alles Fleisch es ist wie Gras
A German Requiem, Op.45: Herr, lehre doch mich
A German Requiem, Op.45: Wie lieblich sind deine Wohnungen
A German Requiem, Op.45: Ihr habt nun Traurigkeit
A German Requiem, Op.45: Denn wir haben hie Keine bleibende Statt
A German Requiem, Op.45: Selig sind die Toten
Given Levine's usual success with Brahms, I had expected more from him. But his sappy performance, indifferently recorded, fails to realize the music's potential in every way. Tempos are lugubrious, textures thick, and the... more » whole thing suffocated by an inappropriate air of reverence. This sort of generic "sacred music" posturing may work in Parsifal, but it really isn't the ticket for Brahms. A surprising disappointment. --David Hurwitz« less
Given Levine's usual success with Brahms, I had expected more from him. But his sappy performance, indifferently recorded, fails to realize the music's potential in every way. Tempos are lugubrious, textures thick, and the whole thing suffocated by an inappropriate air of reverence. This sort of generic "sacred music" posturing may work in Parsifal, but it really isn't the ticket for Brahms. A surprising disappointment. --David Hurwitz
Yvonne Smith | Apple Valley, CA United States | 08/30/2003
(4 out of 5 stars)
"I own three German Requiems and after reading the reviews, I almost didn't buy this one. However, I remembered hearing and liking it years ago, so followed my gut. I'm very glad I did. This is a wonderful performance, full of spirit and fire. It is not, however, a conventional performance and maybe that is what people object to. This performance harks more to Mahler than to Beethoven. Boring it isn't! The sound is crystal, the orchestra brillient, the soloists splendid. Unlike others, I thought the chorus was good. It wasn't at Robert Shaw standards (few are), but it had good dynamic control and crisp articulation. I recommend this performance."
A Small Scaled but Tender Reading of the German Requiem
Grady Harp | Los Angeles, CA United States | 02/20/2005
(4 out of 5 stars)
"James Levine usually goes for the big moments in his conducting and so it is with some surprise that this recording dating back to 1983 is so subdued. Certainly the forces at hand - Chicago Symphony Orchestra and the elegantly trained by Margaret Hillis Symphony Chorus - are able to give more in sheer volume and propulsive impact, so it must be Levine's vision of Brahms.
The tempi are on the slow side: another way of saying the same thing is that Levine lingers on Brahms' lovely phrases. His soloists are among the finest for this deeply touching Requiem. Surely this is one of the most beautiful readings of 'Ihr habt nun Trauerigkeit' by Kathleen Battle of any of the recordings. And Hakan Hagegard has just the right weight and color for the baritone solos. The orchestral playing is caressingly languid and the choral singing floats.
For those who look for a more dramatic reading then the von Karajan/Janowitz/Waechter version remains the one with the most impact. But for the contemplative solace Brahms intended, then this is the reading. Grady Harp, February 2005"
Quite a disappointment
Jeffrey Swaim | Winston-Salem, North Carolina | 12/31/1999
(2 out of 5 stars)
"The Chicago Symphony Chorus is famous for its excellence. Former chorusmaster Margaret Hillis was truly one of the greatest choral conductors of our time. She was a taskmaster, demanding precision and perfection, which she usually received. I counted myself lucky to sing a local "Messiah" concert under her direction a few years ago. What a tremendous experience to learn from this master. Imagine my disappointment when I bought this cd of Brahms' choral gem. The choral singing is incredibly insensitive. It's more of a scream-fest than a requiem. The only redeeming factor is the solo work. Kathleen Battle shines in this chestnut for sopranos. The sound is thrilling: clear and expressive. She spins a line of gold. For a satisfying listening experience of this work, I resort to Shaw's recording with the Atlanta Symphony and Chorus. Sadly, the solo work is not on the same level as the choral singing! If only we could merge the Chicago solo work with the Atlanta recording!"
At the Bottom!
music lover | 04/16/2007
(2 out of 5 stars)
"I became very interested in this work about 4 years ago, and the first recording I bought was the Shaw/ASO version. WHOA! But, being a good musician, I figured I better give some other recordings a listen. This was on the list, and I'm sad to say it was. From the opening movement which is supposed to bring comfort to the grieving, one can tell that the orchestra sounds very clumsy and not together at all. The sopranos sound as if they are screaming in a very non musical way to reach all of the high notes. It gets worse as the second movement approaches ("Behold all flesh is grass"). This is one of the slower approaches to the movement, and it just dosen't work, as the choir sounds very tired and sloppy. Throughout the rest of the work, one wishes that the conductor would just stop and put some emotion, some spirituality into the work, and not worry so much about technical aspects. Overall, as another review stated "a suprising dissapointment." The only redeeming factor is Kathleen Battle, who is AMAZING!"