Search - Roy Harris, Morton Gould, David Alan Miller :: Harris: Symphony 2; Gould: Symphony 3

For the Roy Harris complete-o-phile only

Ypres1918 | Western Pennsylvania, USA | 05/28/2003

(3 out of 5 stars)

"Well, here it is, the Harris Second Symphony. Frankly, I was beginning to think that I'd never live long enough to hear it. So, to Albany who decided to finally have this work recorded: Thank you. I love you guys dearly. Keep up the good work. I'm a loyal customer.To the CD consuming public: ahem...for as much as I typically like Roy Harris and his somewhat quirky and lopsided compositional manner, and for as much as I appreciate Gould (though he's never really been my cup of tea), I have to say that the works on this disc left me...um...nowhere. Personally, I was hoping for more from the Harris. I rather expected a sort of compositional ramp-up that would anticipate his more widely known and appreciated Third Symphony. That didn't happen. In fact, nothing seemed to happen. And believe it or not, that's the whole story. Or, to sum it up in a different way, these works are neither here nor there. They are not quite insipid, but then, they're not quite anything else, either.The bottom line is if you are a Gould nut and must have everything that he's ever composed, or if you are trying to complete the Harris symphonic cycle (which may never really be complete), then this disc is a must. On the other hand if you don't fit into the above catagories, you can safely bypass this disc."

More American Symphonic Music Unearthed!!

Darin Tysdal | Bloomington, MN 55420 | 06/18/2003

(5 out of 5 stars)

"Like the American Symphony, the classical record industry's American CD series' seem to disappear soon after they come out. Delos' American Series died after a few years (although Naxos is re-releasing them now-Yahoo!), Leonard Slatkin and the St. Louis Symphony had a cycle of them, which died after Slaktin moved to the National Symphony Orchestra. Now Albany is utilizing David Allan Miller in recording American symphonic music. Buy these cds when you see them because they become scarce fast! We are in all of their debt for these recordings and hope that other labels and orchestras will follow suit. Naxos' American Classics series is definitely a step in the right direction-witness Kenneth Schermerhorn and the Nashville Symphony Orchestra. Many American composers have symphonies that have been withdrawn. William Schuman's Third Symphony is one of his best-but we probably will never hear Nos. 1 or 2. Peter Mennin did the same thing. Roy Harris' 2nd symphony was withdrawn by the composer. I didn't even know Gould wrote an orchestral symphony (in fact,both composers wrote West Point Symphonies for band.)Again, we should be in Albany's debt for providing us with these works so we can decide. Harris' 2nd symphony has many of the charactaristics of his later style but this work is more reflective in nature. Ditto the Gould symphony, except for the 3rd movement, a "scherzo in Jazz" but like many Gould works, he combines classical and Jazz elements to create a certain style of its own. My own caveat is that I wonder if Miller might have recorded the 2nd version of the last movement of the Gould. The program notes state that Miller was not happy with the revised last movement so he found the original last movement. There is certainly enough time on this disc for that to be included also. Keep 'em coming Naxos and Albany-we are certainly in your debt. Now how about some Wallingford Riegger (whose 1st and 2nd Symphonies were also withdrawn)!"

Mid-20th century Americana

Evan Wilson | Cambridge, MA | 06/13/2003

(4 out of 5 stars)

"This is an interesting disc of two attempts at the Great American symphony. Unlike the other reviewer, I think this disc has quite a bit of merit, though I would agree that neither of these pieces IS the Great American Symphony.The more interesting piece on this disc is the Harris 2nd symphony which the composer suppressed after much difficulties leading up to it's premiere. Conductor Miller has gone back and reinstated all the music that Harris cut at the request of the piece's first conductor. As it stands here, the piece is 21 minutes of interesting ideas which don't wholely jell. I disagree completely with the other reviewer, however, about the distinctiveness of this music. Anyone who knows Harris' justly famous 3rd Symphony will immediately hear the same fingerprints here. While the melodic material isn't as trenchant as it is in the 3rd, the Harris "sound"--which would be adopted by quite a few composers in the 1940s as a uniquely American sound--is clearly here. And no one else who was writing at that time was writing this way.Sure, the 2nd symphony doesn't reach the heights of the 3rd, but frankly Harris was a very uneven composer, and little of the music he wrote AFTER the 3rd reached the pinnacle either. So, if you like the Harris sound, you'll want to snap this up, as the only other company likely to approach this music is Naxos, and there's no guarantee they'll produce a complete Harris symphony cycle.The Gould 3rd symphony is not quite as aurally memorable as the Harris piece, perhaps because Gould here suppresses much of his melodic talent to produce a serious piece. This is rather a mistake, I think, as it renders large bits of the first and last movements as a series of dramatic gestures without real distinction. The middle movements are better with a quiet, serene slow movement being follwed by a rollicking scherzo where the composer's "popular" sound keeps poking its head up. I will listen more to this piece, because I think there are decent things buried beneath the surface, but it clearly isn't a classic.The Albany symphony and David Alan Miller give solidly professional performances and the sound is great. I did feel, however, that it might have been better if both the conductor and musicians had lived with the music a bit more. There was a certain stiffness to both performances and I thought the Harris, in particular, might have jelled more if the conductor gave more attention to some transitions. Overall, though, if the repertoire intrigues you, you probably should take the plunge because no one else is likely to record either piece."