The Rite Of Spring, Part I: The Adoration Of The Earth: Intro
The Rite Of Spring, Part I: The Adoration Of The Earth: Augurs Of Spring - Dances Of The Young...
The Rite Of Spring, Part I: The Adoration Of The Earth: Ritual Of Abduction
The Rite Of Spring, Part I: The Adoration Of The Earth: Spring Rounds
The Rite Of Spring, Part I: The Adoration Of The Earth: Ritual Of The Rival Tribes
The Rite Of Spring, Part I: The Adoration Of The Earth: Procession Of The Sage
The Rite Of Spring, Part I: The Adoration Of The Earth: The Sage
The Rite Of Spring, Part I: The Adoration Of The Earth: Dance Of The Earth
The Rite Of Spring, Part II: The Sacrifice: Intro
The Rite Of Spring, Part II: The Sacrifice: Mystic Circles Of The Young Girls
The Rite Of Spring, Part II: The Sacrifice: Glorification Of The Chosen One
The Rite Of Spring, Part II: The Sacrifice: Evocation Of The Ancestors
The Rite Of Spring, Part II: The Sacrifice: Ritual Action Of The Ancestors
The Rite Of Spring, Part II: The Sacrifice: Sacrificial Dance: The Chosen One
The Poem Of Ecstasy, Op.54
Gergiev's is a Rite of Spring with a difference. He stresses the primitive barbarism of Stravinsky's groundbreaking score--the strange wheezings of the winds, the wild yawps of the tubas, and the deep rumblings of the bass... more » drum. It's a Rite that stands out at a time when so many internationalized western orchestras give the piece an overlay of sophisticated polish that can rob it of the shock factor that drove the audience at the Paris premiere to riot. There are also numerous personal touches that can be controversial, such as the pause before the final chord, which may bother some but which work in the context of the interpretation. Gergiev's Rite faces strong competition from recorded versions by Markevitch, Dorati, Monteux, and Stravinsky himself, but it's definitely among the top choices. The Scriabin's less compelling, though still fascinating. Gergiev's approach tends to sound sectional, as the overall line is subordinated to momentary thrills. --Dan Davis« less
Gergiev's is a Rite of Spring with a difference. He stresses the primitive barbarism of Stravinsky's groundbreaking score--the strange wheezings of the winds, the wild yawps of the tubas, and the deep rumblings of the bass drum. It's a Rite that stands out at a time when so many internationalized western orchestras give the piece an overlay of sophisticated polish that can rob it of the shock factor that drove the audience at the Paris premiere to riot. There are also numerous personal touches that can be controversial, such as the pause before the final chord, which may bother some but which work in the context of the interpretation. Gergiev's Rite faces strong competition from recorded versions by Markevitch, Dorati, Monteux, and Stravinsky himself, but it's definitely among the top choices. The Scriabin's less compelling, though still fascinating. Gergiev's approach tends to sound sectional, as the overall line is subordinated to momentary thrills. --Dan Davis
"This is the finest Rite I have ever heard. I have long listened to Robert Craft (LSO) recording, Stravinsky's own CBS recroding, and Igor Markevitch. These 3 have long been my favorites and I have heard at least a dozen other versions that didn't make the cut. Here we have a conductor who feels this score in his blood. This is an interpretation that reaches deep into the darkness of the soil and earth. It feels the roots of the trees and living things deep down. Tempi are slightly slower than normal (in no way sluggish) that gives a certain gravitas not found in, for example, Craft's otherwise fine recording (however, let me say the sheer shock value from the timapni in Craft's is something that I have never heard equalled). The cellos growl like no other, and there is a certain RAWNESS that is palpable. The opening Dance of the Adolescents sounds like a locomotive in it's deep resonance and power (as opposed to IS's own rec, which sounds like he is toning things down). The final Sacrifical Dance is special in that the drums are heard as distinct as in no other, also with a certain "tribal" primitivness that I have only heard in IS's own recording. Yet the recording is with great emotion, if that can be said of Stravinsky. Listen to the opening famous basson melody... played with a Romantic vibrato that was new to my ears.
This is a once in a generation recording of a seminal work."
A colorful, expansive interpretation
R. Hutchinson | a world ruled by fossil fuels and fossil minds | 10/20/2001
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Ah, Gergiev and the Kirov have finally recorded Stravinsky's "Rite"! This is a colorful, sprawling rendition, light and strong on woodwinds. It summons up images of Russian spring, flowering and bubbling. It reminds me of nothing so much as Debussy. This is not what I expected from the acclaimed Russian conductor, but the detail and nuance are superb. The contrast with the classic 1969 recording by Boulez and Cleveland is striking. Neither is more powerful or passionate, but they employ very different qualities of passion and power. Boulez evokes images of our bloody modern world as opposed to an agrarian past. His is a hard, dark, intense vision with structural focus and clarity, and strong narrative force. If I was forced to choose one, I'd go with Boulez, but the beauty is the variety of interpretations, as Stravinsky himself emphasized, and Gergiev's is excellent! Scriabin's "Poem of Ecstasy" makes a great pairing, highlighting the influence on Stravinsky of his formative milieu, and duplicating Gergiev's earlier pairing of Scriabin with Stravinsky's "Firebird.""
Exiting, but flawed.
Gowdie | New York | 07/19/2006
(3 out of 5 stars)
"Valery Gergiev is indeed one of the best conductors around now. He has a charisma that makes any orchestra soar. That being said, despite the power and exitment involved in this performance of "The Rite of Spring" I'm afraid there are major flaws that have to be mentioned.
In the "Dance of the Earth" section, the percussionist is lost as his entrances with the Tam-tam are out of place with the rest of the orchestra. This is no small mistake, since the Tam-tam is supposed to be unison with the rest of the orchestra. How this error was not discovered before release is something I wont fully understand. I don't fully agree with Gergiev's general concept of having the quieter parts louder than normal. It takes a lot away from the building of tension in a section. But overall, it's an exiting performance.
Alexander Scriabin's "The Poem of Ecstasy" fares well here. Passionate playing from the strings of the Kirov. But even here there's a major editing flaw. During the quiet last pages of the work, for some reason, a measure of the longing violins playing E into D# was accidentaly omited from this performance. This mistake is not too hard to make since it is a repitition of two other measures around it. I've made simular mistakes myself as a recording producer, but I've always corrected it by listening to the whole thing with a score prior to doing a final mix. It appears that this has not been done here.
Despite these major flaws that clearly get in the way (at least for me), this is a distinctive version of these two great works.
Valery Gergiev certanly makes his mark."
Wonderful performance from the Kirov
Daniel L. Ayala | Columbia, SC United States | 01/02/2003
(5 out of 5 stars)
"I hadn't been a fan too much of Gergiev since a DG release of the 1945 version of Firebird and other stravinsky orchestral selections. However, this cd is a revelatory reading of both the Stravinsky and Scriabin pieces. This cd is simply unavoidable due to the hype its received over the past year or so. Since i have been an avid NPR listener and since this was put into the PT50...i just had to check it out. So i did, and loved it. Gergiev does indeed take a very different approach which makes this cd so successful. The bass drum pounds rather than sounding muffled. The brass are not exploited as they have been in other recordings i have. Overall, a very powerful recording. The Scriabin i think needs to be appreciated more by the other reviewers. Gergiev takes a wonderful and straightforward approach to this piece and then at the last 5 mins gives it a wollop that i do not think can be surpassed by anyone. There simply arent many recordings out there of the poem readily available so this one really i think holds its own in the market. I have 4 interpretations of this piece with Maazel, Ashkenazy and Boulez...and my favorite was the Boulez until i picked this up....now hearing the Boulez makes you want to cry. Really the Poem should get more credit, its beautiful and almost frightening toward the end...quite exalting, and definitely indicitive of its "ecstacy" like qualities."
A Rite with a distinctive voice, though the orchestra isn't
John Grabowski | USA | 12/01/2005
(4 out of 5 stars)
"From the opening murmurs, it's clear this is a Rite with a difference. The bassoon solo is truly eerie and mysterious--so many other conductors just toss this off in a blase manner that robs it of its portent, and that makes it easy to forget how attention-getting this music was in 1913 (to say the least).
After so many Rites that sound fairly interchangeable, played with faultless technique but little interpretive insight, here's a fresh vision of what has become, let's face it, a warhorse. And Gergiev *almost* pulls it off perfectly--yes, I'm being extra-critical because I was told and had read that this CD is practically The Second Coming. Well, it *almost* is. After the best Introduction I've *ever* heard, the Dances of the Young Girls has all the barbarism and earthiness it requires, and builds to a suitably explosive climax and a taut Ritual of Abduction. And that's where the first problems creep in. I don't know if it's an engingeering flaw or what, but when the French horns first appear here, they are virtually inaudible. It's as though this were a closely-miked CD (it probably was--almost all are today) and someone forgot to turn up the mikes for the horns at that point. A few moments later they are fine. But there are other moments throughout where certain lines, particularly in the brass, are drowned out. And the trumpets and horns sometimes sound like they are struggling (which I'm sure they are at points; this is extremely difficult music of course). The while the trombones are magnificently gross in Spring Rounds, and have terrific dark bite in Ritual of the Rival Tribes, the trumpets barely make it in the climactic Procession of the Sage, and somehow things don't end with *quite* enough bite there. The various rhythmic elements aren't as clearly delineated as they could be either, and as other have pointed out, there are some outright mistakes, particularly in percussion cues. But this is far from the first recording with this problem. It also may just be a bias of mine: I prefer a rough and raw Rite to a more perfect and polished one. Monteaux on RCA is one of my other favorite CDs of this piece, and that too has a lot of snags in the performance. They don't bother me.
Yes, there is roughness here; there also are extraordinary bits of textural detail and dramatic moment that I've never heard in a Rite before. He really draws out the lento of The Kiss Of The Earth (unmarked in the CD booklet for some reason, but it's the slow quiet bit that comes just before the explosive end of the first part), lingering on the rest just before 72 in the score and dwelling on that magnificent "ppp" chord in the strings. (And they really play it ppp--the effect is spooky.) Similarly, in the Introduction to Part Two, he brings out marvelous detail in the interplay among flutes, piccolos and piccolo clarinets in a way I've never before heard. Similarly, the rhythmic pizz. strings/horn combo in Ritual Action of the Ancestors is so clear and well-voiced that this section takes on a color and dimension I've not heard before. Throughout this Rite, Gergiev takes his time and the result is great transparency. Throughout this Rite he draws out the details; slow parts are luxuriously slow, while the fast parts are never overly fast. (Only Ritual of the Rival Tribes seemed a *little* brisk to me.) Gergiev's dramatic, unscripted last pause before the final chord (delivered like Barry Bonds slamming one out of the stadium) is appropriately primal, if perhaps not sanctioned by the composer.
The Poem of Ecstasy, after such a thrilling Rite, is almost like an afterthought. I have little to compare this Poem to--just two other recordings by Inbal and Boulez, and no access to a score, so I'll leave that to someone else, as well as someone with more of an affinity for Scriabin. Suffice it to say this disc is well worth it for the Rite alone. This recording stands, along with Markevitch, Mouteaux, and Raphael Fruhbeck de Burgos (sorry, Lenny!) as one of the great Rites on record. (Avoid the composer's own recording, unless you are a Stravinskyphile or enjoy clumsy and stiff conducting.)"