Symphony No. 1 In D Minor, Op. 13: Grave - Allegro ma non troppo
Symphony No. 1 In D Minor, Op. 13: Allegro animato
Symphony No. 1 In D Minor, Op. 13: Larghetto
Symphony No. 1 In D Minor, Op. 13: Allegro con fuoco
Symphony No. 2 In E Minor, Op. 27: Largo - Allegro moderato
Symphony No. 2 In E Minor, Op. 27: Allegro molto
Track Listings (5) - Disc #2
Symphony No. 2 In E Minor, Op. 27: Adagio
Symphony No. 2 In E Minor, Op. 27: Allegro vivace
Symphony No. 3 In A Minor, Op. 44: Lento - Allegro moderato
Symphony No. 3 In A Minor, Op. 44: Adagio ma non troppo
Symphony No. 3 In A Minor, Op. 44: Allegro
At two discs for the price of one, and three outstanding performances, this set offers great value. Most impressive is the performance of the First Symphony, the disastrous premiere of which precipitated a nervous breakd... more »own. As a consequence, the work was not revived until after the composer's death. In many ways, it's his most closely argued symphony--each movement begins with the same theme, and they share other melodic material as well. Vladimir Ashkenazy's performance is simply the finest ever committed to disc. He's just about as impressive in the two later works, though there the competition is tougher. The magnificent playing of the Concertgebouw Orchestra certainly adds to this set's attractions. --David Hurwitz« less
At two discs for the price of one, and three outstanding performances, this set offers great value. Most impressive is the performance of the First Symphony, the disastrous premiere of which precipitated a nervous breakdown. As a consequence, the work was not revived until after the composer's death. In many ways, it's his most closely argued symphony--each movement begins with the same theme, and they share other melodic material as well. Vladimir Ashkenazy's performance is simply the finest ever committed to disc. He's just about as impressive in the two later works, though there the competition is tougher. The magnificent playing of the Concertgebouw Orchestra certainly adds to this set's attractions. --David Hurwitz
"In my years of buying classical CDs I would consider these two discs to stand among the most truly distinctive and excellent recordings that I have ever owned. I have heard very few recordings of any composer's music that rival this set on combined criteria of recording engineering, artistic interpretation, and sheer listening excitement. In addtion, I would place these recordings among the very finest I have ever heard conducted by Vladimir Ashkenazy and of the London/Decca recording company.The First Symphony, whose traumatic premiere still seems to haunt Rachmaninoff by the very writing of it by 20th century commentators, is thoroughly vindicated in this recording. Ashkenazy manages to produce high drama and a peerless musical response from the Concertgebouw Orchestra. You will find it a superb alternative to other recordings available.The Second Symphony, in which the highest degree of competition exists among other outstanding recordings, Ashkenazy elicits a first-rate recording and interpretation. The first movement allows the listener to hear with great detail the full dimension and scale of the great Concertgebouw Orchestra. The early 1980s recording quality of this--and the other two--symphony are of the highest demonstration quality.The Third Symphony is my favorite. Ashkenazy brings out the Slavic qualities intended by the composer. In the exposition, which is repeated in the first movement--something not found in all recordings, caution--the bells of the orchestra show the Russian Orthodox overtones to this work. The second and third movements are full of emotion and energy. You will find passages that offer sublime drama, a strong understanding of the composer's intentions, and window-rattling sound reproduction. These are beautiful recordings. I offer an unqualified recommendation to anyone interested. And as a two-for-the-price-of-one these recordings are of unparalleled value."
A Beautiful Touch with Rachmaninov
Jeffery A. Triggs | New Jersey | 02/13/2008
(5 out of 5 stars)
"These set the modern standard for the Rachmaninov symphonies. Ashkenazy shows a remarkable affinity for the music. The little known 1st is given a performance that justifies its revival in the repertory. The uncut 2nd is breathtakingly beautiful. Ashkenazy allows it all its "heavenly length" - the complex textures of the first movement, the stunningly energetic scherzo, the beautifully languorous adagio, the delightful cascading "bells" of the last movement. My favorite, however, is the underrated 3rd, for which Ashkenazy displays uncannily "right" tempi throughout. Many conductors luxuriate in the lovely, diving violin solo in the second movement, and no exception here, but how many capture the logic of the final minutes of the symphony? Ashkenazy and the Concertgebouw get it just right - the late, nostalgic revery, and then, quietly at first, the build up to an exhilerating, final frenzy. With other conductors this can seem confused or forced, but here the denouement is perfectly paced and has an inevitable logic that is wonderfully satisfying. Every time I listen to this, I feel a glow of pleasure at having bought these recordings."
Top selection
Geers | Netherlands | 01/20/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
"All symphonies. As far as I am concerned, particularly symphonie 1 is very allright. The others are good too, but this one number one is really brilliant. Warm music. Picture a group of Chossacs preparing for battle on horse with horns for this music. Absolute. Almost evrything this Ashkenazy does with Rach music is great."
Ashkenazy isn't inspired, but oh, the sound and the orchestr
Santa Fe Listener | Santa Fe, NM USA | 11/04/2008
(4 out of 5 stars)
"Decca long ago positioned Vladimir Ashkenazy as a splashy conductor worthy of top-flight orchestras and gorgeous sonics (i.e., a kind of Russian Andre Previn). He's never been an inspired interpreter, however, and once you get past the extravert manner and the Royal Concertgebouw's ravishing playing, ideas are thin on the ground here. Arguably, Rachmaninov doesn't need ideas -- his lush music plays itself as easily as a Korngold film score, with all the swoon and a touch of the sleaziness -- but every composer deserves inspiration.
Here the three symphonies are played vigorously, with lots of splashy effects but not much soul or sensitivity. David Hurwitz can always be counted on for a laugh, and his point that the First Sym. is "closely argued" is like saying that Milton's 'Paradise Lost' is terse. Rachmaninov wrote only one masterpiece in the genre, the Second Sym., and that's the one that Ashkenazy needs to prove his mettle by. I don't think he does. His good friend Previn plays the score with twice the excitement and conviciton (EMI), and any number of Russians -- Temirkanov, Bychkov, Jansons, Svetlanov -- find more to say in this music beyond Technicolor melodies.
Rachmaninov's rambling, discursive style needs lots of advocacy from the podium to get us over long stretches of dog paddling, and Ashkenazy doesn't do that. I am giving four stars msotly for sound and orchestra, both of which are superb."