Finally back in the catalog & at a bargain price too.
S. Baird | Baton Rouge, LA United States | 05/31/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
"The very first recording I bought featuring Zubin Mehta at the podium just happened to be Tchaikovsky's Romeo & Juliet coupled with the 1812 Overture, back when the record was first released. I was just a young guy then, and you could say that it was Zubin Mehta who later tutored me somewhat in learning about classical music. So impressed was I with this record, that I would, for some years afterward, choose a record featuring him as conductor over any others. At one time (in my late twenties) I had nearly every recording that he had done for Decca/London. I had grown to appreciate a certain élan that I found recognizable in his interpretations, and, as a budding audiophile too, the above average sound that his label afforded him meant that I would usually be happy with the sound quality. By the time that Zubin Mehta moved to New York, my own appreciation of classical music had grown such that he was just one of many idols in my own private classical music pantheon.
Still, I continued to buy Mehta's new releases, and a boxed set of the Tchaikovsky symphonies was one purchase I made upon its initial release. As a collection, this ranks with many of my most favorite performances of these symphonies. Overall, it's fair to say that Mehta's panache shines through on them, the Fourth Symphony perhaps the most individual. Here Mehta rushes through the pizzicato third movement a bit more quickly than his predecessors would have, but very much in keeping with the way conductors today like to pace the music. The Sixth, too, comes on briskly, but with all of the bravado the composer intended. I'll concede, though, that I prefer Dorati's performances of the 1st & 2nd on Mercury.
What really separates this set today from others is that for the amount of music one receives for the price, the bonus is the sound quality. Add to that some absolutely wonderful accounts of the other orchestral showpieces included here, and the lagniappe is all the bigger and better. I don't think that the Romeo & Juliet Overture has ever had a better recorded performance."
Brilliant Packaging, Great Track Selections, Too Bad About t
Frederick Baptist | Singapore | 07/13/2006
(2 out of 5 stars)
"This is a very attractive package of all Tchaikovsky's Symphonies plus selections from the 3 famous ballets and other symphonic works like the Romeo and Juliet and 1812 Overtures. The cardboard box is slim and the 5 discs fit very snugly in this box which comes with an attractive booklet to boot. The sound quality, however, is abysmal; straining my ears at a high volume level, it's clear that Zubin Mehta and the L.A. PO are not at fault as their interpretations of the master's works are very good but the alleged remastering work needs to be seriously redone.
You can hardly even hear the first 2 discs and what makes this even more ludicrous is the fact that even the 1812 Overture sounds soft! Volume levels improve only slightly on the other discs but overall this is one of the worst classical cds, sound quality-wise that I've ever heard. Too bad though as everything else about this package was very good. Another prime example of not judging a book by its cover.
Give this a miss."
Bargain price, Decca sonics, but only so-so conducting
Santa Fe Listener | Santa Fe, NM USA | 11/02/2006
(3 out of 5 stars)
"When I think about the trajectory of Mehta's career, the best decade is the first when he was the darling of Los Angeles and much of the classical music world. This was his period of energetic, passionate conducting, followed by a steady, sad decline into mediocrity. But this Tchakovsky cycle belies such a pat story, since a good deal of it is mediocre, too, and yet it comes from Mehta's prime period (excepting a later remake of the Sym. #4). The best things about it are the super-budget price (about half of what Naxos charges nowadays) and the vibrant Decca sonics, which make the LA Phil. of that era sound quite exciting.
As for the interpretations, the earlier symphonies come off best, especially Sym #1 "Winter Dreams," which is light and balletic in Mehta's hands. The close microphone placement takes us right into the middle of the woodwinds, so there are lots of delicious sounds even when Tchaikovsky's writing isn't first rate. But by contrast, Sym. #2 "The Little Russian" sounds rather flabby and uninvolving. Who knows why? In place of the crisp tempos in the First Sym., every movement moves without energy.
Sym. #3 "Polish" is the most problematic of the six, and few conductors can make its sprawling structure and halting rhythms cohere. Mehta does better than most. He gives us springy rhythms and lovely detail from the winds. I'd rate this version higher than those from Karajan, Abbado, and perhps even Bernstein. Mehta seems to understand why this symphony made such successful ballet music (in "Jewels") for Balanchine.
Now we arrive at Tchaikovsky's three late masterpieces, where the competition is brutal. To excel in Sym. 4-6, a conductor must be either very profound or very Russian. Mehta is neither. We know we're in for a dull slog from th outset of Sym. #4, which is inert, prettily played, and superficial. The Decca engineers supply some visceral mpact, particularly in the explosive finale, but nothing explodes from the podium.
Along the way to Sym. #5 we get a number of fillers (the 1812 Over., suite from Swan Lake, Capriccio Italien, etc.) but they are played like run-throughs. The same holds true for the Fifth itself, which is performaed in the same cautious mode as the Fourth. Again, the opening bars make the fate motif sound casual rather than mysterious and pregnant with meaning. The two inner movements are pretty, and the finale, where almost eveyr conductor knows how to bust out of the corral with a wild ride, is quite tame here.
So we end with the Pathetique, arriving without much hope for any real depth or drama. In fact, Mehta delivers a minor surprise when he energizes the first movement, aided as ever by the Decca engineers. The 5/4 waltz goes by agreeably, the march that follows is crisp and full of sparkling detail. The climax delivers a good deal of sonic punch. Too bad the wrenching finale swoons and sways without much emotional effect or real tragedy. In all, the Sixth is one of Mehta's better efforts until the end. Finally, A sweet and soothing reading of Romeo and Juliet in gorgeous sound. One has heard better and worse.
So is mediocrity worth it even at an ultra-bargain price? Not to me. For anyone who seeks a bargain set of the Tchaikovsky symphonies, it's hard to beat Temirkanov on RCA, where the conducting comes straight out of the heart of Russia."
Tchaikovsky with character!
fuhred | 06/16/2007
(4 out of 5 stars)
"It is wonderful to see Mehta's Los Angeles refreshing Tchaikovsky set reissued. There are idiosyncracies here and there, but overall this is much more preferable than the dull, DULL symphony sets by Abbado on Sony, and especially Pletnev on DG. The sound quality in the symphonies is very full, crisp and brilliant (These are analogue 1975-1977). 1812 and Romeo are earlier, and have been remastered well. The Ballet Suites and Capriccio are with the Israel Philharmonic are somewhat drier. So to the performances:
No.1 is a strong performance, maybe a little TOO forceful. Tempos here (as throughout the whole cycle) tend to be on the quick side. The slow movement suffers in this respect. The scherzo is shorter than usual - Mehta doesn't observe the repeat.
No.2 is the highlight of the set. I am reminded (and maybe Mehta was too) of the old mono Minneapolis recording with Dmitri Mitropoulos here. Tempos again are on the swift side, and this seems absolutely right for this work. The first movement's allegro starts off moderately, but soon picks up the pace (the LA double basses are fantastic!). This is high-voltage Tchaikovsky! The second movement is fast and crisp (this movement isn't a funeral march like Markevitch or Karajan seem to think...), and the scherzo goes at a breath-taking gallop. The finale sets the seal on the performance. Like the first movement, the main Allegro vivo section starts almost sheepishly, but soon turns into a huge flood of sound (hear that enormous tam-tam stroke before the coda!!). Wow!
No.3 is more suite than symphony, and Mehta treats it as such, the outer movements given with a real swing. The central Andante elegiaco is gorgeous and the LA strings relish it.
No.4 receives a very dramatic performance, the opening movement even more urgent than the famous Leningrad Mravinsky account. The way Mehta whips up the development into a frenzy has to be heard to be believed, and the climax is electrifying, the recapitulation exploding in on the listener. Again, Decca's engineering is a marvel! Only the finale lets the peformance down a bit, Mehta not pushing on enough in the coda.
No.5 is fair, but not earth-shattering. Rhythms are nicely lifted, but everything here is just a bit matter-of-fact. (n.b. Try to listen to the 'live' recording of No.5 by Justus Frantz, bad edit and all - simply stunning!!)
The same applies with the Pathetique, but kudos to Mehta for using the bassoon instead of the bass-clarinet just before the first movement's development section, it's the only recording I know that observes this!!.
Overall, a very good set, if not my first choice. That honour still belongs to Karajan overall (especially 4-6), and try Maazel's superbly pain-ridden VPO account of Manfred too. But Mehta's No.2 is still tops!"