Search - Thelonious Monk :: Thelonious Monk - Greatest Hits

Good starter set for the mystic Monk...

William E. Adams | Midland, Texas USA | 01/20/2003

(5 out of 5 stars)

"An earlier reviewer thinks it is disrespectful to Monk's other albums to create a "Greatest Hits." I disagree, because some beginners on low budgets need an entry-level CD to a musician this prolific and complex. I quickly learned in the late 50's and early 60's that I preferred my own tastes to someone else's selections, after investing in several "Greatest Hits" collections. I can't imagine anyone who buys this one either being unhappy with it, or ending here. You need to know this about Thelonious: he recycled his favorite compositions time and again, using different combos and soloists, leading with the piano or receding as he felt the spirit. "Epistrophy" on this CD takes only two-and-a-half minutes using TEN players. It takes three minutes on "Best of the Blue Note Years" with only four players. The version on "Greatest Hits" is from 1963 and the other one from 1948. Other tunes common to both albums, 15 years apart, are "Well You Needn't" and "Misterioso" and "Round Midnight" and "Ruby My Dear" and "Straight, No Chaser." Yet these are quite different recordings. I happen to like the '60's versions you are about to buy better than the '40's first recordings, but others will differ. It's comparing Mercedes to BMW, even though the versions were "written" by the same guy, and performed by the same cat. "Ruby My Dear" on Blue Note takes three minutes in a trio version. It takes twice as long on the Columbia disc although Monk plays it solo. "Well You Needn't" takes three minutes on Blue Note in '48 with a trio, and nearly 13 minutes on "Greatest Hits" with a quartet. You get the idea. Don't think that if you buy a Monk release with the same titles you'll be getting the same listening experience. That is part of what makes him fascinating. I believe the CD we are discussing is a worthy buy, especially for a newcomer. I also agree that no one who likes jazz or piano or genius can possibly stop right here and be satisfied."

Not a bad choice to start

J. Lowrie | State College, PA United States | 01/16/2001

(5 out of 5 stars)

"unlike many 'greatest hits' collections that aren't, this one includes some of his best compositions and recordings.so this is a certainly good place to start. but don't presume that this one record is sufficient for it honestly only scratches the surface of his genius."

2 stars PLEASE 0 stars 4U

William E. Adams | 02/27/2004

(5 out of 5 stars)

"The 2 stars review is nonsense. I first picked this album up pon vinyl when I was a teenager (about 14). I was curious about it because of a version of Well You Needn't I had on an album by Kenny Burrell. "Greatest Hits" may have been a silly title for any release by Monk, particularly in the 60's. But the music it contained captured my attention and drew me to seek out more of Monk's music. Though I now own most of the albums from which these selections came, I still like the sequence in which they appear here. I purchased it again, when it came out on CD and was delighted to have it. Not a bad song or performance in the lot. Great as most of the Monk albums are, there is the occasional clunker that I skip at every play. Not so here. The Ruby My Dear gets me today, just as it did when I was a 14 year old kid and hearing it (and being amazed) for the first time.
If your curious about Monk, jump in right here, the water is fine (and plenty deep)."