"I tend to get enraged when people criticize recordings because they do not match the yardsticks of the past. For example, someone in this page says that Levine's version is not worthy of attention because it is not comparable to what Hans Knappertsbusch used to do in the 1950's. Well, first of all, Knappertsbusch was also famous for his slow tempos and, second of all, if this person is referring to what Knappertsbusch actually recorded that's a problem. To be sure, many recording producers agreed upon the fact that Knappertsbusch was not really a studio conductor. Indeed his genius tended to arise only (by some sort of very mysterious reason) in live performances. But the problem here is not really the comparison between Levine and Knappertsbusch. The real problem is the tendency of some wagnerites to not let go a tradition that lies in the past and that is not going to come back (whether this is good or bad is another matter). This is not to say that Flagstad, Varnay, Nilsson, Melchior, Svanholm, Vinay, Hotter, Knappertsbusch and, many others, indeed set what can be deem as the ideal approach to Wagner. But, let's face it, they're all gone. We now have to live with the artists of our times and try to appreciate, in their own terms, what they have to offer us. So, there's Placido Domingo singing Parsifal. I first must confess that I'm not Domingo's ultimate fan. I tend to find difficult to digest his bolero-mariachi-tango-and-what-have-you cross-over stuff and, especially, the "Three Tenors" thing . But that does not go in the way of acknowledging that the man is a true phenomenon. And, after seeing and hearing him as Parsifal a few weeks ago at the Met, after he made me burst into tears on several occasions during that evening (the temptation scene with Urmana as Kundry...Oh, my goodness!), I have to say that I surrendered to Placido, the opera singer. Everything he does transpires such beauty and poetry. Every phrase is uttered with such meaning and emotion. Of course he is not a Heldentenor (and he does not have the slightest pretention of becoming one or sound like one) and his approach is basically an Italian one. He sings his Parsifal as he sings his Otello or his Radames. Such artistry is so rare and miraculous. Now, about Levine's approach to the score and, especially, his tempos. This is the way Levine conducts Wagner. You always have the sensation of extremely dense musical textures, of an inextinguishable aural vapor constantly flowing. The sensation is amazing. Isn't Parsifal a long, very long, quasi-mystical musical event? Isn't it an uninterrupted flow of music leading to redemption? It has to be played as if the music was coming from another world. Parsifal's music is primal, essential, as if all music was coming from there. I think Levine conveys all that. Perhaps this is not as striking on recording as it is in the opera house where, believe me, it's a miracle unfolding before your eyes. The man never looses his focus (for the whole almost six hours!) and grips the audience in such a way that people don't seem to move or even breathe. In sum, this comment is just an invitation to approach this recording in its own terms, just letting two of the foremost musicians of our time utter a statement of profound artistry and beauty."
The most wonderfully alive version out there
Grady Harp | 10/09/2003
(5 out of 5 stars)
"To preface everything I say, I have to admit that this Wagner opera (along with Tristan) were for me the most boring theatrical experiences of my life. It took me years to appreciate either of them (I attended Tristan 5 times and never stayed awake once during it). However, Parsifal was the opera that took me the longest to enjoy. I find it simply does nothing for hours on end. The conflicts are so SLOW it is worse than watching a soap opera. In my desire to learn to appreciate this opera (I loved most all his other ones instantly, especially the Ring), I bought a number of recordings and borrowed others from the public library. Even then it took me a few years to get through the opera without becoming completely bored silly. And after all that work, I still was more than bored when I saw it in the theatre (and I went to the "Sacred Wagner Hall" to watch it; I was never more bored by his operas as I was in his festival house; they are immured in stone worse than dusty museum pieces by the "Wagner tradition" usually of very bad singing for the sake of the words, and during the long hours of nothing happening, there isn't even much to grab the eye). Through the years I have come to enjoy it to some degree, but it is still NOT my favorite Wagner opera. The reason I bought this recording was specifically because of Jessye Norman and Domingo. I enjoy what they do, so I figured maybe they have something to add that would make this work less boring and tedious. Well, they did. Firstly, James Levine, though he is not the quickest in tempo, did breathe life into the work (and I was never more bored than when I listened to Karajan conducting it -- so fussy with details the whole is lost). The singers approached the opera quite differently than all the singers I had listened to through the years -- it became a lyric work, rather than a declamatory one. That approach, no matter if it is GOOD Wagner or not, or even if it fits into the traditions of Wagner, made the work more approachable for me. I felt I was listening to real singing for a change, and not a sea of orchestra washing over some sceaming and yelling. I really care less if either of these two singers sings like the typical Heldentenore, or soprano, we are used to, for even Wagner himself never heard the kind of singer we hear today and associate with his music. He always sought for singers with good vocal production that sang Italian opera well and had excellent legato line. It was his wife, Cosima, who developed that "Bark" his music became noted for in an attempt to make the words clearer than the music, and often many great recordings of the past show just how off the pitch these performers could get, but since they were upholding tradition, it was too sacred to condemn. To those who love the opera, I am sure you have other singers you love better, as you fell in love with the work listening to them (and we all have troubles enjoying someone else when we come to love someone in a role), but for those of you who have not made up your mind, and written it in stone, this recording is very beautiful. Norman is very lovely in the role (which is often sang by a mezzo, or a soprano -- one usually dark when needed to be but screeching in dramatic moments, the other usually screeching all the time because her voice is not large enough for the score), and for a change we actually do hear caressing sounds most of the time, even in highly dramatic moments. Domingo is wonderful, and lyrical, which adds tremendously to the long, often uninteresting music he has to sing. The other singers are really good too, and they sing with a good feel for legato and musical line. That musicality, that lyrical quality, adds to this opera, and it is quite refreshing to finally hear it. Of all my recordings of this opera, this is the only one I will listen to, the others bore me silly. Even then, I can't listen to this opera in one sitting, I am still not to that point with this work. So, I would recommend this recording over most others out there simply because I can sit through it. I know that is not a ringing endorsement like so many others give, but it is a true one."
My most prized recording of all!
Arne Fagerholt | Norway | 04/17/2006
(5 out of 5 stars)
"This is in my opinion the perfect Parsifal! The casting is the ultimate; Jessye Norman?s Kundry, Domingo?s Parsifal, Kurt Moll?s Gurnemanz, Wlaschia?s Klingsor and perhaps the best of them all; James Morris?Amfortas!
On top of all this, add Levine?s conducting, yes, it IS slow, but never dragging or boring, frankly with this music it cannot last long enough!
This CD has the place of honour among my other recordings of Parsifal, by Solti and Knappertsbusch, and is the most precious music on my shelf altogether, thanks to everyone involved in preserving this ultimate Parsifal for the future to enjoy!"
A Lyrical, Reverential Parsifal: Opera as Ritual
Grady Harp | Los Angeles, CA United States | 11/27/2005
(5 out of 5 stars)
"Though it is common knowledge that Richard Wagner and his family closely guarded his final masterwork PARSIFAL, forbidding performances outside his theater at Bayreuth for years after his death, the reason for this overprotective custody of this penultimate Sacred Piece is readily evident when the opera is experienced in today's opera houses. Many impresarios demand that the original trappings of the work remain as close to the original as possible and outside Bayreuth that often makes the masterwork seem more superficial than spiritual. Seeking singers that mimic the Bayreuth sound and staging the work with arrow-pierced plastic swans, flying javelins/spears, crumbling evil castles and coping with the appearance of the Holy Grail at opera's end all inevitably distract form the beauty of the music - a score that is Wagner's most complex, most original, and most beautiful.
This 1994 recording from the Metropolitan Opera comes as close as any to adapting to the spirit of Parsifal rather than the traditions that often encase it in a sarcophagus that prevents the immediacy of the message to touch audiences in this century. And the primary reason this recorded interpretation succeeds is in the casting of Placido Domingo as the innocent fool Parsifal. His is a richly hued, baritone-informed tenor voice that he uses with utmost intelligence, musicality, lyricism, and insight: the result is a Parsifal so credible that all of the mystery of this tale becomes poignant instead of just another mythological tale about the quest for the Holy Grail. His singing is never less than beautiful and never more than vocal cords can sensibly sustain. His is a Parsifal to treasure.
Of incidental interest, now eleven years later Domingo is singing Parsifal in the ingenious production designed, staged, and lighted by the controversial Robert Wilson at the Los Angeles Opera demonstrating how healthy his voice remains and how even more sensitive his interpretation has grown. Though one wishes for the Kundry of Violeta Urmana with whom he performed a concert version of Act II with Pierre Boulez and the LA Philharmonic two years ago (rather than the competent but vocally pushed Linda Watson of the current cast), the full cast is rich and well sung and the performance is under the enlightened majesty of Kent Nagano's rapturous conducting. It is a true Spiritual Journey.
While for this listener this 4 CD set is the best of the recorded versions of PARSIFAL, it is not without some weaknesses, but those can seem minor in the total result. James Levine is a singer-sensitive conductor and still finds the mystery in the Prelude and Good Friday Spell portions. His overall arc of the score sags a bit in the tough Act II tempi but is compensated by some of the most glorious flower maiden singing on CD. Kilngsor's one act of evil just doesn't frighten nor, sadly does Kundry's enigmatic role in this drama: Jessye Norman sings beautifully but sounds more concerned with the execution of the line than with the insight into the motifs that unravel the secrets that will send Parsifal on his quest for illumination.
The remainder of the cast offers a superb Gurnemanz with Kurt Moll and a serviceable Amfortas with James Morris and the choral singing is lovely. But in the end it is the humanity of Domingo's Parsifal that lifts this recording into the realm of the great ones. Highly Recommended. Grady Harp, November 05"